In industrial environments, every second counts. The efficiency with which a plant transforms inputs into final products directly impacts costs, competitiveness, and the ability to respond to market demands. However, many companies still operate without precise and continuous measurement of their actual productivity.
Evaluating productivity in industrial plants is not only a matter of overall performance but also of visibility: detecting hidden losses, anticipating bottlenecks, and making data-driven decisions. This article takes a concrete look at how to achieve that, without overlooking the complexity of the operational context.
<<<Good Habits to Increase Work Productivity>>>
At its most basic, industrial productivity is the relationship between the amount of product generated and the resources used (time, materials, labor, energy). However, in practice, that relationship is influenced by dozens of variables: downtime, micro-stoppages, unplanned maintenance, input quality, and even workplace ergonomics.
That’s why measuring only “production per shift” or “monthly output” is no longer enough. Companies that seek true efficiency must go one step further: breaking down productivity by lines, cells, or processes, and using plant data to make smarter operational decisions.
<<<E-book: A new productivity revolution>>>
One of the most widely used models in the industrial world is OEE (Overall Equipment Effectiveness). This indicator combines three key dimensions:
Multiplying these three factors provides a percentage that reflects the actual effectiveness of a machine, line, or plant. A plant with an OEE of 85% is already considered world-class. Most operate between 60% and 75%, though many don’t even know it due to a lack of precise measurement.
<<<Main problems in quality management: How to avoid them?>>>
One of the greatest advantages of measuring productivity with tools like OEE is the ability to detect losses that often go unnoticed.
For example, in a metalworking plant, Line A may have higher production volume than Line B. However, when measuring OEE, it turns out that Line A loses more hours in tool changeovers, while Line B operates more steadily. That difference may reveal issues in scheduling, training, or maintenance.
These hidden losses can be divided into three main types:
Measuring them requires integrating sensors, MES (Manufacturing Execution Systems), or even well-designed manual dashboards. But above all, it requires the willingness to look at data objectively.
<<<Quality control: 5 essential indicators>>>
Plants that achieve sustained productivity improvements don’t do so only through large investments, but through well-targeted micro-adjustments. To achieve this, breaking down measurements by line, cell, or even by shift can provide critical insights.
Example: in a food plant, breaking down productivity data by line revealed that the night shift had lower performance—not due to lack of capacity, but due to the absence of technical supervision for minor failures. Simply adding a senior technician to that shift raised OEE by 7%.
These analyses allow operational decisions such as:
The key lies in establishing reliable measurement systems with daily indicators, and fostering a culture where data is seen as a tool, not punishment.
When productivity isn’t properly measured, plants often operate at the limit without realizing it. Demand grows, orders pile up, and the typical response is to add overtime or request investment in new equipment. But often, the plant already has unused capacity.
Proper evaluation of productivity in industrial plants allows these problems to be anticipated before they affect delivery or costs. Measuring efficiency by line helps estimate how much more could be produced with current equipment, if certain bottlenecks were resolved.
These analyses are also key to making more strategic decisions, such as:
In recent years, digital tools have made it easier to collect and analyze operational data. IoT sensors, SCADA software, Power BI dashboards, or mobile production apps are already present even in small and medium-sized industrial companies. However, the true transformation doesn’t come only from technology, but from mindset.
A productive plant is not just a factory of goods, but also a source of real-time data. Operations leaders must become “plant readers,” understanding what data reveals about people, processes, and machines.
Industrial productivity doesn’t improve with more effort, but with smarter decisions. And those decisions require visibility. Evaluating productivity is not an accounting exercise—it is a way of managing the present and designing the future.